We’ve discussed a few times the difficulty of supplying the war effort in Afghanistan. We’ve talked mostly about how tenuous the lines of communication are leading into the country. That’s the “wholesale” side of the equation. The “retail” side is getting the supplies from the major bases out to all the small outposts scattered across the country.  There are really only three options

  1. Send it by truck
  2. Send it by helicopter
  3. Aerial delivery

You can figure out what a truck convoy looks like. And for a long time, the army was geared toward that model. But truck convoys are vulnerable to ambush in the close terrain of Afghanistan’s highlands.

Helicopter delivery is very common for a great many outposts. But there is always a shortage of helicopters, and helicopters have a fairly limited load capacity.

That leave a niche where aerial delivery is the best option for moving supplies. Check out this photo I found at Theo Spark.

That’s forty bundles of fuel, with what looks like four 55gal. drums in each bundle. That works out to about  8800 gallons of fuel.  Given the costs of the pallets and chutes and the hourly cost of flying the cargo plane, that’s some pretty damn expensive fuel.

But it is cheaper than loosing a tanker truck and a its crew in an ambush.

3 thoughts on “Airmail”

  1. Very cool pic. The pallets under those drums appear to have layers of material that will compress when they land to absorb the impact & weight of the barrels. Bet they look a lot different after they hit the ground. *squishhhhhhed!* Am I right?

  2. another interesting note is how tightly packed the pallets are on exit.
    chute deployment is somewhat “violent” and tangling would most likely result in delivery failure…
    each pallet has a weight of approx. 1584 pounds. (not counting pallet and chute & rigging)(certain ass hump tions apply)
    landing speed with chute ?…
    but F=ma doesn’t change….
    they hit hard….
    TC – that’s a neat pic

    (wonder how the ‘goat hunting is there….)

Comments are closed.