HEP-T

One of our earliest posts here was an explanation of HEAT rounds ands Sabot. Those, of course, aren’t the only possible projectiles for a tank main gun, but they are the primary anti-tank rounds.

Our friends at Think Defence reminded us of another approach, popular in the 1950s.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CT-QrIrWEAAxlKy.jpg

HESH, High Explosive Squash Head, also known as HEP, or High Explosive Plastic, was a round that was simply a big old lump of plastic explosives in a very thin walled container.  When the round struck armor, it would not penetrate at all. Rather, it would squash up against the armor, flattening out. A slightly delayed fuse in the base of the projectile would then detonate the charge.

The shock of the blast would not blow a hole in the armor. It would, however, cause sheering stresses on the far side of the armor, resulting in spalling. That is, parts of the interior surface of the armor would break off and fly about the inside of the vehicle at high velocity, either incapacitating the crew, or setting off ammunition or other flammables.

The HESH was primarily popular with the British. US forces tended to stay with the HEAT round. HESH was quite effective against early Cold War Soviet tanks such as the T-54/55 series, and the T-62.  But its greater weight than a heat round meant a lower muzzle velocity, which in turn meant less accuracy. On the other hand, HESH was also quite effective against fortified positions, something HEAT wasn’t always very effective against.

The only routinely fielded HESH round in the US Army was a very low velocity round for the 165mm demolition gun on the M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle, where it was used for reducing obstacles.

Modern composite armor and relatively light and inexpensive spall liners (such as Kevlar blankets inside Bradleys) have rendered HESH rounds mostly obsolete.

1 thought on “HEP-T”

  1. Never got to see a live 165mm HEP round fired. I did watch our CEV gunnery one time with the TP rounds. More like a lob than a direct shot. IIRC the minimum safe distance was larger than the range on the gun (1000m?).

Comments are closed.