So, Hugh Hewitt says if the GOP doesn’t increase the DoD budget, that’s bad.
Then Kurt Schlichter (who, in addition to being a lawyer is a retired Army Reserve Colonel) weighs in.
For my money, I’m with Kurt.
XBradTC's thoughts… deep thoughts.
So, Hugh Hewitt says if the GOP doesn’t increase the DoD budget, that’s bad.
Then Kurt Schlichter (who, in addition to being a lawyer is a retired Army Reserve Colonel) weighs in.
For my money, I’m with Kurt.
Comments are closed.
Concur. Schlichter has it right.
Hey, who does Kurt sound like?
All three authors raise the correct basic point which is that our military is on the ropes in a practical sense while the big budget item R&D programs go fiscally forward with a “kind of” definitive purpose. The good Colonel’s thoughts regenerate the monies in military budgets AND exhibits how a practical budget would work if the under seen waste, fraud, and abuse is largely obliterated. My complimners to the good Colonel.
I think the good Colonel is onto something. Alas, giving the DOD more money has often just gone into fat during my lifetime. It’s not just a problem with Libtards, it’s also a problem with so called Conservatives as well.
You should not only cut funding, but you should reduce SES and above O5 personnel by 25% (I’d opt for reducing SES by 50%). I tried of a Navy that has more Admirals than ships.
Should have been: I’m (not trying to imitate Hillary speak).
Schlicter by a nose. It’s time for the DOD to make some more hard choices. And, yes, I have seen some cuts in the last couple of years…