What a Statesman Sounds Like

The contrast with our President is stark indeed.  A clear and rational petition for the safety and existence of his nation and his people.

Small wonder that Obama and the far-left Democrats objected so much to Netanyahu’s appeal for the survival of Israel.  We get the Cairo speech, and “don’t insult Islam”.


What’s some of the reaction to Netanyahu’s speech from the Arab world?

Tzvi Yechezkieli, the Arab affairs expert of Channel 10, said that many Arab commentators supported the content of Netanyahu’s speech. He cited a commentator on Al-Arabiya TV, who had said that he could have written a large part of the speech.

Yechezkieli said that the Arab countries are convinced that Obama will not safeguard their security interests in the current negotiations with Iran and will not protect them against Iranian aggression.

The above is not isolated opinion, either.  There was this on Bibi’s speech at AIPAC:

Yesterday, Faisal J. Abbas, the powerful Editor-in-Chief of Al Arabiya English, published an editorial under the headline: “President Obama, listen to Netanyahu on Iran.” Abbas’ editorial was a reaction to Netanyahu’s speech to AIPAC yesterday.

He wrote: “In just a few words, Mr. Netanyahu managed to accurately summarize a clear and present danger, not just to Israel (which obviously is his concern), but to other U.S. allies in the region.”

The Saudi Daily Al-Jazirah published an article written by Dr. Ahmad Al-Faraj, who supported Netanyahu’s decision to speak to the U.S. Congress against the upcoming deal with Iran. He called Obama “one of the worst American presidents” and said that Netanyahu’s campaign against the deal is justified because it also serves the interests of the Gulf States.

Barack Obama and his fellow travelers seem to be the only ones, aside from Iran, that were critical of the Prime Minister’s address.

10 thoughts on “What a Statesman Sounds Like”

  1. I found it “interesting” that the Demoncrats were ready, as soon as Bibi finished speaking, to go on camera with a “Rebuttal”!
    Really, a rebuttal to what? Bibi was not speaking for the Republicans. Why was there the need for a Democrat “rebuttal”?
    Why, it’s almost as though they had their “Talking Points” handed to them before-hand.
    Rep Yarmuth(A token self-hating JEW!!!), was selected to call Bibi names, though he was not even present for the speech.
    It was as though the left was striking-out at Bibi for casting doubt on “Their Precious”, not that they had any problems with what he was saying about the danger that a nuclear Iran presented to Israel, the Gulf States, or America.
    We have become an unserious nation.

    1. Unfortunately ignorant Americans and rigged elections have made our bed. Now we are forced to sleep with the Mulatto Jackenapes. Pray that we will eventually wake up.

    1. -whoops- sorry for the double post… But I worry that its a bunch of political noise, that in looking for a stick to whack democrats with, the republicans have stumbled onto the important issue but I worry that all they see is another stick.

  2. Netanyahu 2002 : “If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region and I think that people sitting right next door in Iran, young people, and many others, will say the time of such regimes, of such despots is gone.” Yeah, that’s some statesman.

    1. Had we not cut and run in Iraq, and not turned our backs on Iranian opposition, that might have come to pass. But our President did both of those, and then entered into nuclear negotiations with a fundamentalist Islamist state that vows the destruction of not just Israel but the United States. It took Netanyahu to make the case for the dangerous stupidity of such an idea.

      Yeah, that Barack Obama, that’s some statesman.

Comments are closed.